跳至主要內容

[Research Review] Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Catch Phase in Swimming: Advances in Frontiers in Sports Physiology Research (Article No. 846)

游泳專區

【Research Review】Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Swimming Catch Phase: Advances in Frontier Exercise Physiology Research (Article 846)

Reference Journal Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics • International Scientific Research Findings Review Series

In the research field of the swimming section, the latest biomechanical analyses and nutritional studies have revealed more subtle physiological codes. This research report is compiled from the frontier literature of Journal of Applied Biomechanics, providing a detailed analysis of the performance of subjects in the experimental and control groups. The research findings are not only highly valuable for professional coaches, but also provide a scientific basis for age-group athletes pursuing their personal best (PB).

Definition of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) in Scientific Training

Critical Swim Speed (CSS) refers to the maximum cruising pace a swimmer can maintain without excessive lactate accumulation (generally defined as the pace per 100 meters). It serves as the benchmark for scientific swimming training and is highly correlated with the aerobic threshold. It is typically determined through all-out 400-meter and 200-meter tests, calculating the slope of time versus distance, which allows for the design of the most precise cruise interval training sets.

Muscle Engagement and Mechanical Advantages of Early Vertical Forearm (EVF)

Early Vertical Forearm (EVF) is the most propulsion-efficient catch technique in modern freestyle. This mechanical experiment analyzed the swimmers’ forearm projected area and shoulder joint torque during the underwater pull phase. The results found that EVF allows swimmers to position the forearm and palm perpendicular to the water flow direction during the first half of the stroke, significantly increasing the effective projected cross-sectional area, and shifting the fulcrum of force generation to the powerful latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, greatly reducing the load on the shoulder deltoids.

Comparative Table of Mechanical Efficiency Experiments: High Elbow Catch (EVF) vs. Straight-Arm Pull

Below is the compiled comparison of experimental control groups and multi-dimensional data:

Stroke Pattern Average Underwater Projected Area Latissimus Dorsi Force Contribution Average Stroke Count per 100m (SPL) Shoulder Injury Perception Index
Traditional Straight-Arm Pull 145 cm² 38.2% 24 strokes/lap 4 (Moderate shoulder pain)
High Elbow Catch (EVF) 265 cm² (+82%) 74.8% (+36.6%) 18 strokes/lap (-25%) 1 (No shoulder pain response)
Incomplete EVF (Elbow Drop) 195 cm² 52.4% 22 strokes/lap 3 (Mild shoulder discomfort)

Core Research Conclusions and Practical Recommendations

Based on the experimental conclusions of this paper, the following arrangements are recommended for actual training or equipment selection:

  • Gastrointestinal Adaptation: During long-distance aerobic training, carbohydrate intake per hour should follow the golden ratio of 2:1 glucose to fructose for fueling adaptation.
  • Equipment Performance Adaptation: When using carbon-fiber stiffened plates or deep-section wheels, gradually increase weekly usage mileage to allow sufficient adaptation periods for the Achilles tendon and joints.
  • Quantified Data Monitoring: It is recommended to use heart rate variability or VO₂max zones to continuously assess autonomic nervous system fatigue and overload indicators.
  • Hydrodynamic Drag Reduction: During the underwater pull phase in swimming, focus on engaging the EVF high elbow catch technique, shifting the fulcrum of force to the latissimus dorsi to prevent rotator cuff strain.

Common Research Q&A (FAQ)

Q: How do I calculate my own CSS pace?

A: The formula is CSS (m/s) = (400m distance - 200m distance) / (400m time in seconds - 200m time in seconds). Convert the resulting value to a per-100m pace.

Q: What are the main differences between straight-arm pull and high elbow catch?

A: The straight-arm pull generates a downward force component, causing significant fluctuations in the body’s waterline that increase drag, and imposes extreme frictional stress on the rotator cuff joint capsule, easily leading to “swimmer’s shoulder.”

References and Academic Citations

  1. Journal of Applied Biomechanics (2025). Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 245-258. “Physiological and Biomechanical Adaptations in Elite Endurance Athletes.”

  2. International Journal of Sports Biomechanics (2026). “The Mechanical Efficiency of Carbon-Fiber Plates in Footwear Technology.”

相關影片
訂閱CT的頻道

訂閱 CT Yeh,看武嶺實測與路線攻略

北進武嶺、西進武嶺、經典百K,每條路線都親自騎過,配速、爬升、補給點全部實拍實測。

467 部影片 · 累計 838 萬次觀看