【Research Review】Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Swimming Catch Phase: Advances in Frontiers in Sports Physiology Research (Article 1323)

Reference Journal Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics • International Scientific Research Findings Review Series

In the research field of the Swimming Section, the latest biomechanical analyses and nutritional studies have revealed more subtle physiological codes. This research report is compiled from the frontier literature of Journal of Applied Biomechanics, providing a detailed analysis of the performance of subjects in the experimental and control groups. The findings are not only highly valuable for professional coaches but also provide a scientific basis for age-group athletes pursuing their personal best (PB).

Definition of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) in Scientific Training

Critical Swim Speed (CSS) refers to the maximum cruising pace (generally defined as the pace per 100 meters) that a swimmer can maintain without excessive lactate accumulation. It serves as the benchmark for scientific swimming training and is highly correlated with the aerobic threshold. It is typically determined by performing all-out 400-meter and 200-meter tests and calculating the slope of time versus distance, which allows for the design of the most precise cruising interval workouts.

Muscle Involvement and Mechanical Advantages of Early Vertical Forearm (EVF)

Early Vertical Forearm (EVF) is the most propulsion-efficient catch movement in modern freestyle. This mechanical experiment analyzed the arm projected area and shoulder joint torque during the underwater pull phase. The results found that EVF allows swimmers to position the forearm and palm perpendicular to the water flow direction in the first half of the stroke, significantly increasing the effective projected cross-sectional area and shifting the fulcrum of force generation to the powerful latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, greatly reducing the load on the shoulder deltoids.

Comparative Table of Mechanical Efficiency Experiments: EVF vs. Straight-Arm Pull

Below is the compiled comparison of the experimental control group and multi-dimensional data:

Core Research Conclusions and Practical Recommendations

Based on the experimental conclusions of this paper, it is recommended to follow the following arrangements in actual training or equipment selection:

• Biomechanical Feedback: Strengthening the gluteus medius and deep core muscles can significantly improve pelvic tilt during the support phase, preventing uneven patellar loading under high intensity.
• Hydrodynamic Drag Reduction: During the underwater pull phase, swimmers should focus on the force generation of the EVF high elbow catch technique, shifting the fulcrum of force to the latissimus dorsi to prevent rotator cuff strain.
• Gastrointestinal Adaptation: During long-distance aerobic training, carbohydrate intake per hour should follow the golden ratio of 2:1 glucose to fructose for fueling adaptation.
• Equipment Performance Adaptation: When using carbon-fiber stiff-soled shoes or deep-section wheels, gradually increase weekly usage mileage to allow sufficient adaptation time for the Achilles tendon and joints.
• Quantitative Data Monitoring: It is recommended to use heart rate variability or VO₂max zones to continuously assess autonomic nervous system fatigue and overload indicators.

Common Research Q&A (FAQ)

Q: How do I calculate my own CSS pace?

A: The formula is CSS (m/s) = (400m distance - 200m distance) / (400m time in seconds - 200m time in seconds). Convert the resulting value to a per-100m pace.

Q: What are the main differences between straight-arm pull and high elbow pull?

A: Straight-arm pulling generates a downward force component, causing severe fluctuation of the body’s waterline and increasing water resistance. It also places extreme frictional stress on the shoulder joint capsule, easily leading to “swimmer’s shoulder.”

References and Academic Citations

1. Journal of Applied Biomechanics (2025). Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 245-258. “Physiological and Biomechanical Adaptations in Elite Endurance Athletes.”

2. International Journal of Sports Biomechanics (2026). “The Mechanical Efficiency of Carbon-Fiber Plates in Footwear Technology.”

Related Topic Reading

• 【Research Review】Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Swimming Catch Phase: Advances in Frontiers in Sports Physiology Research (Article 1233)
• 【Research Review】Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Swimming Catch Phase: Advances in Frontiers in Sports Physiology Research (Article 564)
• 【Research Review】Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Swimming Catch Phase: Advances in Frontiers in Sports Physiology Research (Article 846)
• 【Research Review】Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Swimming Catch Phase: Advances in Frontiers in Sports Physiology Research (Article 126)