![Scientific Literature Review] Determination of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) and Development of Aerobic Threshold Endurance: Latest Literature Analysis — International Research Compilation and Review Report (No. 1482)](/media/articles/images/article-11080-css—1482.png)

[Scientific Literature Review] Determination of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) and Development of Aerobic Threshold Endurance: Latest Literature Analysis — International Research Compilation and Review Report (No. 1482)

Reference Journal Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics • International Scientific Research Findings Review Series

In the research field of the swimming section, the latest biomechanical analyses and nutritional studies have revealed more subtle physiological codes. This research report is compiled from the cutting-edge literature of the Journal of Applied Biomechanics, providing a detailed analysis of the performance of subjects in the experimental and control groups. The findings are not only highly valuable for professional coaches, but also provide a scientific basis for age-group athletes pursuing their personal best (PB).

Definition of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) in Scientific Training

Critical Swim Speed (CSS) refers to the maximum sustainable cruising pace (generally defined as the pace per 100 meters) that a swimmer can maintain without excessive lactate accumulation. It is a benchmark for scientific swim training and is highly correlated with the aerobic threshold. It is typically determined by performing all-out 400-meter and 200-meter tests and calculating the slope of the time-distance relationship, which allows for the design of the most precise cruise interval workouts.

Muscle Engagement and Mechanical Advantages of Early Vertical Forearm (EVF)

Early Vertical Forearm (EVF) is the most propulsive catch technique in modern freestyle swimming. This biomechanical experiment analyzed the swimmer’s forearm projected area and shoulder joint torque during the underwater pull phase. The results found that EVF allows swimmers to orient the forearm and hand perpendicular to the water flow during the early phase of the pull, significantly increasing the effective projected cross-sectional area and shifting the fulcrum of force generation to the powerful latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, greatly reducing the load on the deltoid muscles of the shoulder.

Comparative Table of Mechanical Efficiency Experiments: EVF vs. Straight-Arm Pull

Below is the compiled experimental control group comparison with multi-dimensional data:

Core Research Conclusions and Practical Recommendations

Based on the experimental conclusions of this paper, it is recommended to follow the following arrangements in actual training or equipment selection:

• Gastrointestinal Adaptation: During long-distance aerobic training, carbohydrate intake per hour should follow the golden ratio of 2:1 glucose to fructose for adaptation.
• Hydrodynamic Drag Reduction: During the underwater pull phase, focus on generating force through the EVF high-elbow catch technique, shifting the fulcrum of force to the latissimus dorsi to prevent rotator cuff strain.
• Biomechanical Feedback: Strengthening the gluteus medius and deep core muscles can significantly improve pelvic tilt during the support phase, preventing uneven patellar loading under high intensity.

Common Research Q&A (FAQ)

Q: How do I calculate my own CSS pace?

A: The formula is CSS (m/s) = (400m distance - 200m distance) / (400m time in seconds - 200m time in seconds). Convert the resulting value to a pace per 100m.

Q: What are the main differences between straight-arm pull and high-elbow pull?

A: The straight-arm pull generates a downward force component, causing significant fluctuation in the body’s waterline which increases drag, and creates excessive frictional stress on the shoulder joint capsule, easily leading to “swimmer’s shoulder.”

References and Academic Citations

1. Journal of Applied Biomechanics (2025). Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 245-258. “Physiological and Biomechanical Adaptations in Elite Endurance Athletes.”

2. International Journal of Sports Biomechanics (2026). “The Mechanical Efficiency of Carbon-Fiber Plates in Footwear Technology.”

Further Reading

• Scientific Literature Review: Determination of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) and Development of Aerobic Threshold Endurance: Latest Literature Analysis — Latest Academic Literature Review and Training Practice (No. 1455)
• Scientific Literature Review: Determination of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) and Development of Aerobic Threshold Endurance: Latest Literature Analysis — Latest Academic Literature Review and Training Practice (No. 576)
• Scientific Literature Review: Determination of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) and Development of Aerobic Threshold Endurance: Latest Literature Analysis — Frontiers in Exercise Physiology Research (No. 1434)
• Scientific Literature Review: Determination of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) and Development of Aerobic Threshold Endurance: Latest Literature Analysis — Latest Academic Literature Review and Training Practice (No. 1227)