跳至主要內容

【Research Review】Critical Swimming Speed (CSS) Assessment and Aerobic Threshold Endurance Development: Latest Literature Analysis — Study on Physiological Characteristics of Elite Athletes (Article No. 1500)

游泳專區

【Research Review】Critical Swim Speed (CSS) Measurement and Aerobic Threshold Endurance Development: Latest Literature Analysis — Physical Fitness Characteristics of Elite Athletes (Article 1500)

【Research Review】Critical Swim Speed (CSS) Measurement and Aerobic Threshold Endurance Development: Latest Literature Analysis — Physical Fitness Characteristics of Elite Athletes (Article 1500)

Reference Journal Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics • International Research Findings Review Series

In the research field of the Swimming Zone, the latest biomechanical analyses and nutritional studies have revealed more subtle physiological codes. This research report is compiled from the cutting-edge literature of Journal of Applied Biomechanics, providing a detailed analysis of the performance of subjects in the experimental and control groups. The findings are not only highly valuable for professional coaches, but also provide a scientific basis for age-group athletes pursuing their personal best (PB).

Definition of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) in Scientific Training

Critical Swim Speed (CSS) refers to the maximum sustainable cruising pace (generally defined as the pace per 100 meters) that a swimmer can maintain without excessive lactate accumulation. It is the benchmark for scientific swim training and is highly correlated with the aerobic threshold. It is typically determined through all-out 400-meter and 200-meter tests, calculating the slope of time versus distance, which allows for the design of the most precise cruise interval workouts.

Muscle Engagement and Mechanical Advantages of Early Vertical Forearm (EVF)

Early Vertical Forearm (EVF) is the most propulsive-efficient catch technique in modern freestyle. This mechanical experiment analyzed the swimmer’s forearm projected area and shoulder joint torque during the underwater pull phase. The results found that EVF allows swimmers to orient the forearm and palm perpendicular to the water flow during the first half of the stroke, significantly increasing the effective projected cross-sectional area and shifting the fulcrum of force generation to the powerful latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, greatly reducing the load on the deltoid muscles of the shoulder.

Comparative Table of Mechanical Efficiency Experiments: EVF vs. Straight-Arm Pull

Below is a compiled comparison of the experimental control group and multi-dimensional data:

Stroke Pattern Average Underwater Projected Area Latissimus Dorsi Force Contribution Average Stroke Count per 100m (SPL) Shoulder Injury Perception Index
Traditional Straight-Arm Pull 145 cm² 38.2% 24 strokes/lap 4 (Moderate shoulder pain)
High Elbow Catch (EVF) 265 cm² (+82%) 74.8% (+36.6%) 18 strokes/lap (-25%) 1 (No shoulder pain response)
Incomplete EVF (Dropped Elbow) 195 cm² 52.4% 22 strokes/lap 3 (Mild shoulder discomfort)

Core Research Conclusions and Practical Recommendations

Based on the experimental conclusions of this paper, it is recommended to follow the following arrangements in actual training or equipment selection:

  • Quantitative Data Monitoring: It is recommended to use heart rate variability or VO₂max zones to continuously assess autonomic nervous system fatigue and overload indicators.
  • Biomechanical Feedback: Strengthening the gluteus medius and deep core muscles can significantly improve pelvic tilt during the support phase, preventing uneven patellar loading under high intensity.
  • Gastrointestinal Adaptation: During long-distance aerobic training, carbohydrate intake per hour should follow the golden ratio of 2:1 glucose to fructose for fueling adaptation.
  • Hydrodynamic Drag Reduction: During the underwater pull phase, focus on generating force with the EVF high-elbow catch technique, shifting the fulcrum of force to the latissimus dorsi to prevent rotator cuff strain.

Common Research Q&A (FAQ)

Q: How do I calculate my own CSS pace?

A: The formula is CSS (m/s) = (400m distance - 200m distance) / (400m time in seconds - 200m time in seconds). Convert the resulting value to a per-100m pace.

Q: What are the main differences between straight-arm pull and high-elbow catch?

A: Straight-arm pull generates a downward force component, causing significant fluctuation of the body’s waterline which increases drag, and places extreme frictional stress on the rotator cuff joint capsule, easily leading to “swimmer’s shoulder.”

References and Academic Citations

  1. Journal of Applied Biomechanics (2025). Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 245-258. “Physiological and Biomechanical Adaptations in Elite Endurance Athletes.”

  2. International Journal of Sports Biomechanics (2026). “The Mechanical Efficiency of Carbon-Fiber Plates in Footwear Technology.”

相關影片
訂閱CT的頻道

訂閱 CT Yeh,看武嶺實測與路線攻略

北進武嶺、西進武嶺、經典百K,每條路線都親自騎過,配速、爬升、補給點全部實拍實測。

467 部影片 · 累計 838 萬次觀看