跳至主要內容

Road Bike Aerodynamics 101: How CdA Determines Your Watt Bill at 40 km/h

單車訓練

The Faster You Go, the More Expensive the Air Gets

Riding resistance is primarily composed of rolling resistance and aerodynamic drag. At low speeds, the two are comparable, but aerodynamic drag is proportional to the square of speed, and the power required to overcome it is even related to the cube of speed. At 40 km/h, aerodynamic drag typically accounts for over 80% of total resistance—which means the biggest lever for increasing speed on flat roads isn’t pedaling harder, but making yourself smaller and slicker.

CdA vs. Required Power Reference (Flat road, 40 km/h, no wind)

Position/Setup Approximate CdA (m²) Approximate Power to Maintain 40 km/h
Road bike, hands on hoods ~0.40 ~360 W
Road bike, hands on drops ~0.32 ~300 W
Time trial bike, standard aero bars ~0.24 ~250 W
Wind-tunnel-optimized TT position ~0.20 ~225 W

(Values are indicative magnitudes; individual variation is large. They are meant to illustrate trends, not absolute values.)

What Is CdA

CdA is the product of the drag coefficient (Cd) and the frontal projected area (A), expressed in square meters. It combines “how slippery you are” with “how much frontal area you present to the wind” into a single comparable number. Going from the hoods to an optimized TT position can nearly halve CdA, which at 40 km/h equates to saving over 100 watts—no training prescription can give you 100 watts for free in the short term.

Position vs. Equipment: Which Contributes More

A common misconception is to first spend money on aero wheels. In reality, body position (especially torso angle and tucking in the shoulders) contributes far more to CdA than any single piece of equipment.

  • Position optimization: Contributes the largest share of CdA improvement, and at zero cost
  • Helmet and clothing: Second-largest contribution, with high cost-effectiveness
  • Frame and wheels: Smallest contribution, but with the highest marginal cost

Why Both Wind Tunnel and Outdoor Testing Matter

The wind tunnel provides controlled, relative comparisons, but it cannot fully replicate the yaw angle variations and subtle body movements of real riding. The modern approach is to first fine-tune using a wind tunnel or computational fluid dynamics, then validate real-world CdA using outdoor power-speed regression (such as the Chung method). The two are complementary; neither can be omitted.

Aerodynamics is one of the few truly “free” sources of speed in endurance sports. With the same legs and the same training, simply lowering your torso and tucking your shoulders can save you triple-digit watts at 40 km/h. In a world where every watt must be earned through sweat, CdA is the one bill you can pay with posture rather than pain.

相關影片
訂閱CT的頻道

訂閱 CT Yeh,看武嶺實測與路線攻略

北進武嶺、西進武嶺、經典百K,每條路線都親自騎過,配速、爬升、補給點全部實拍實測。

467 部影片 · 累計 838 萬次觀看