The Science of Human-Machine Collaboration in Electric-Assist Bicycles: A Quantitative Study of Ebike Riding Efficiency

Introduction
In 2023, the global electric-assist bicycle (Ebike) market surpassed US$40 billion and continues to grow rapidly. Yet behind this commercial success, a scientific question remains under debate: Does riding an Ebike truly count as real exercise? And how can the collaboration efficiency between the electric-assist system and human power be scientifically quantified?
For competitive athletes, E-MTB (electric-assist mountain bike) events have become an independent racing discipline; for the general public, the Ebike serves both as a commuting tool and a means to increase daily physical activity. This article analyzes the operating principles of Ebike systems and research findings from the scientific perspective of human-machine collaboration efficiency.
Energy Flow in Ebike Drive Systems
Human-Machine Power Distribution Models
The power output of modern mid-drive Ebike systems (such as Bosch, Shimano EP8, and Brose) is determined jointly by human power and the motor:
$$P_{total} = P_{human} + P_{motor}$$
Different brands typically configure different Assistance Ratios:
| Assistance Mode | Typical Assistance Ratio | Motor Power (W) | Rider Power (W) | Total (W) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eco | 50–60% | 40–60 | 80–120 | 120–180 |
| Tour | 100–120% | 80–150 | 80–120 | 160–270 |
| Sport | 150–200% | 120–200 | 80–120 | 200–320 |
| Turbo/Boost | 250–340% | 200–300 | 80–120 | 280–420 |
Precision of Torque Sensing
High-quality Ebike systems use Torque Sensors rather than lower-cost cadence sensors, allowing precise reading of the rider’s force application at any point in the pedal stroke and real-time adjustment of motor output for a more natural assist feel. Research shows that torque-sensing systems score 35–40% higher than cadence-sensing systems on human-machine collaboration smoothness ratings (subjective perception scales).
Scientific Quantification of Physiological Load
Exercise Intensity of Ebike Riding
Multiple studies have compared the physiological intensity differences between Ebikes and conventional bicycles on identical routes:
| Study | Subjects | Route | Ebike vs Conventional VO₂ | Ebike vs Conventional Heart Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peterman et al. (2016) | Healthy adults | Urban commuting | -30 to -40% | -20 to -30 bpm |
| Castro et al. (2022) | Middle-aged and older adults | Hilly riding | -25 to -35% | -15 to -25 bpm |
| Vuu et al. (2023) | Sedentary population | Off-road trails | Still reaches moderate intensity | 65–75% of maximum heart rate |
Scientific Support for “It Still Counts as Exercise”
Although Ebikes reduce the rider’s absolute physiological load, multiple studies show that riding still meets the definition of “Moderate Intensity Physical Activity” (3–6 MET):
- WHO recommends adults engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week
- Commuter Ebike riders average approximately 4.5–5.5 MET per ride, meeting the threshold for effective exercise
- Studies also show that Ebike users ride significantly more minutes per week than conventional bicycle users (because distance and terrain barriers are easier to overcome)
Ebike Competitive Science: E-MTB
Physiological Demands of E-MTB Racing
Electric-assist mountain bike racing (E-MTB) has been officially recognized as a competitive discipline by the UCI. Compared with traditional MTB racing, the physiological characteristics of E-MTB include:
- Average speed increases by 25–40%, raising the technical demands of the course accordingly
- Longer stage distances (assist enables riders to complete longer stages), requiring greater aerobic endurance
- Battery management becomes a tactical element: switching between high and low assist modes resembles energy management strategies in motorsport
Interaction Between Motor Efficiency and Pedaling Cadence
Research has found that the electrical-to-mechanical conversion efficiency of Ebike mid-drive motors is highly correlated with rider cadence:
- Optimal efficiency cadence: 70–90 rpm (varies slightly by brand)
- Excessively low cadence (< 60 rpm): high motor torque output but low efficiency, accelerating battery drain
- Excessively high cadence (> 100 rpm): the motor must process higher-frequency torque input, and efficiency also drops slightly
This means Ebike riders should consciously maintain a reasonable cadence—not only for physiological efficiency but also to extend battery range.
Battery Efficiency and Energy Management
Factors Affecting Actual Range
| Factor | Impact on Battery Consumption |
|---|---|
| Total weight (rider + bike) | Each additional 10 kg increases consumption by approximately 8–12% |
| Average gradient | Each 1% increase in gradient increases consumption by approximately 5–8% |
| Wind speed (headwind) | A 10 km/h headwind increases consumption by approximately 15–25% |
| Assistance mode | Turbo vs Eco: consumption difference can reach 3–4 times |
| Tire pressure | Low pressure (< 2 bar) increases consumption by approximately 5–10% |
Practical Recommendations
- Choose a torque-sensing motor system: It provides a more natural human-machine collaboration feel and better encourages the rider to maintain active pedaling effort
- Maintain an appropriate assistance ratio: Avoid using the highest assist mode the entire ride; keep rider power within the aerobic zone (moderate intensity) to gain health benefits
- Manage cadence: Maintain a cadence of 75–85 rpm to balance both physiological efficiency and battery efficiency
- Battery thermal management: Battery efficiency drops significantly in low-temperature environments (< 10°C); warm the battery to room temperature before departure
Related Reading
#公路車 #Fitting 靠人工智慧APP 幫你調整單車
6 年前
2025 自行車錶排行榜 兩萬車友大數據 / Garmin Bryton 排名會大洗牌嗎? / 全新的碼表前身分析 /公路車 / CT Yeh
1 年前
2023 自行車錶排名 大數據 23,000位車友用什麼錶? Garmin Edge 對決 Bryton Rider 誰市佔高? 你用的上榜了嗎? | 公路車 | CT Yeh
3 年前
全台首發!邁金P715踏板功率計!市場價格撼動者再出招 / 功率對比實測 / FAVERO ASSIOMA 可參考! / 公路車 / CT Yeh
1 年前
靠單車減肥35公斤 心得分享與整理
7 年前
2022 前十五大自行車錶 !? 兩萬名車友大數據統計 | 你的上榜了嗎? | 菁英車友都用哪些錶? | Bryton Garmin 誰能拔得頭籌?| 車錶推薦 | 公路車 CT Yeh
4 年前
大家都在開箱的...單車用藍芽對講耳機真的有幫助嗎? SENA BiKom 20 長距離旅遊 & 海鷗繞圈賽 實際體驗心得 / 公路車 / CT Yeh
9 個月前
Fitting訓練兩用功率車 ! Thinkrider ST900 完整實測!/ 坡度升降 / 鄰居測試/ smart bike/公路車/ CT Yeh
2 年前