跳至主要內容

The Science of Human-Machine Collaboration in Electric-Assist Bicycles: A Quantitative Study of Ebike Riding Efficiency

訓練科學

The Science of Human-Machine Collaboration in Electric-Assist Bicycles: A Quantitative Study of Ebike Riding Efficiency

Introduction

In 2023, the global electric-assist bicycle (Ebike) market surpassed US$40 billion and continues to grow rapidly. Yet behind this commercial success, a scientific question remains under debate: Does riding an Ebike truly count as real exercise? And how can the collaboration efficiency between the electric-assist system and human power be scientifically quantified?

For competitive athletes, E-MTB (electric-assist mountain bike) events have become an independent racing discipline; for the general public, the Ebike serves both as a commuting tool and a means to increase daily physical activity. This article analyzes the operating principles of Ebike systems and research findings from the scientific perspective of human-machine collaboration efficiency.

Energy Flow in Ebike Drive Systems

Human-Machine Power Distribution Models

The power output of modern mid-drive Ebike systems (such as Bosch, Shimano EP8, and Brose) is determined jointly by human power and the motor:

$$P_{total} = P_{human} + P_{motor}$$

Different brands typically configure different Assistance Ratios:

Assistance Mode Typical Assistance Ratio Motor Power (W) Rider Power (W) Total (W)
Eco 50–60% 40–60 80–120 120–180
Tour 100–120% 80–150 80–120 160–270
Sport 150–200% 120–200 80–120 200–320
Turbo/Boost 250–340% 200–300 80–120 280–420

Precision of Torque Sensing

High-quality Ebike systems use Torque Sensors rather than lower-cost cadence sensors, allowing precise reading of the rider’s force application at any point in the pedal stroke and real-time adjustment of motor output for a more natural assist feel. Research shows that torque-sensing systems score 35–40% higher than cadence-sensing systems on human-machine collaboration smoothness ratings (subjective perception scales).

Scientific Quantification of Physiological Load

Exercise Intensity of Ebike Riding

Multiple studies have compared the physiological intensity differences between Ebikes and conventional bicycles on identical routes:

Study Subjects Route Ebike vs Conventional VO₂ Ebike vs Conventional Heart Rate
Peterman et al. (2016) Healthy adults Urban commuting -30 to -40% -20 to -30 bpm
Castro et al. (2022) Middle-aged and older adults Hilly riding -25 to -35% -15 to -25 bpm
Vuu et al. (2023) Sedentary population Off-road trails Still reaches moderate intensity 65–75% of maximum heart rate

Scientific Support for “It Still Counts as Exercise”

Although Ebikes reduce the rider’s absolute physiological load, multiple studies show that riding still meets the definition of “Moderate Intensity Physical Activity” (3–6 MET):

  • WHO recommends adults engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week
  • Commuter Ebike riders average approximately 4.5–5.5 MET per ride, meeting the threshold for effective exercise
  • Studies also show that Ebike users ride significantly more minutes per week than conventional bicycle users (because distance and terrain barriers are easier to overcome)

Ebike Competitive Science: E-MTB

Physiological Demands of E-MTB Racing

Electric-assist mountain bike racing (E-MTB) has been officially recognized as a competitive discipline by the UCI. Compared with traditional MTB racing, the physiological characteristics of E-MTB include:

  • Average speed increases by 25–40%, raising the technical demands of the course accordingly
  • Longer stage distances (assist enables riders to complete longer stages), requiring greater aerobic endurance
  • Battery management becomes a tactical element: switching between high and low assist modes resembles energy management strategies in motorsport

Interaction Between Motor Efficiency and Pedaling Cadence

Research has found that the electrical-to-mechanical conversion efficiency of Ebike mid-drive motors is highly correlated with rider cadence:

  • Optimal efficiency cadence: 70–90 rpm (varies slightly by brand)
  • Excessively low cadence (< 60 rpm): high motor torque output but low efficiency, accelerating battery drain
  • Excessively high cadence (> 100 rpm): the motor must process higher-frequency torque input, and efficiency also drops slightly

This means Ebike riders should consciously maintain a reasonable cadence—not only for physiological efficiency but also to extend battery range.

Battery Efficiency and Energy Management

Factors Affecting Actual Range

Factor Impact on Battery Consumption
Total weight (rider + bike) Each additional 10 kg increases consumption by approximately 8–12%
Average gradient Each 1% increase in gradient increases consumption by approximately 5–8%
Wind speed (headwind) A 10 km/h headwind increases consumption by approximately 15–25%
Assistance mode Turbo vs Eco: consumption difference can reach 3–4 times
Tire pressure Low pressure (< 2 bar) increases consumption by approximately 5–10%

Practical Recommendations

  1. Choose a torque-sensing motor system: It provides a more natural human-machine collaboration feel and better encourages the rider to maintain active pedaling effort
  2. Maintain an appropriate assistance ratio: Avoid using the highest assist mode the entire ride; keep rider power within the aerobic zone (moderate intensity) to gain health benefits
  3. Manage cadence: Maintain a cadence of 75–85 rpm to balance both physiological efficiency and battery efficiency
  4. Battery thermal management: Battery efficiency drops significantly in low-temperature environments (< 10°C); warm the battery to room temperature before departure
相關影片
訂閱CT的頻道

訂閱 CT Yeh,看武嶺實測與路線攻略

北進武嶺、西進武嶺、經典百K,每條路線都親自騎過,配速、爬升、補給點全部實拍實測。

467 部影片 · 累計 838 萬次觀看