跳至主要內容

The Science of Climbing Pace: Differences in Energy Expenditure Between Average Power and Steady Climbing

單車訓練

The Science of Climbing Pace: Energy Expenditure Differences Between Average Power and Even Pacing

The Science of Climbing Pace: Energy Expenditure Differences Between Average Power and Even Pacing

Introduction

Every time a long climb approaches, many cyclists face the same dilemma: should you maintain a steady speed, or maintain a steady power output? This may seem like a minor detail, but it could determine whether you finish the ride smoothly or “blow up” before reaching the summit. This article delves into the fundamental differences between these two strategies from the perspectives of exercise physiology and physics, helping you make smarter pacing decisions on your next climb.

The Trap of Even-Paced Climbing

Intuitively, maintaining a fixed speed while climbing seems reasonable. However, real mountain roads often have undulating gradients—even on climbs known for “steady gradients” like Wuling or Alishan, each section can still vary by 1–3%.

When the gradient increases by 1%, maintaining the same speed requires roughly 8–12% more power (depending on body and bike weight). This means you must briefly surge on steeper sections and recover on flatter ones, creating a sawtooth power pattern. This “surge–recover” mode places higher anaerobic demands on your muscles, accelerating lactate accumulation, and ultimately causing faster fatigue in the latter half of the climb.

The Physiological Advantage of Even Power

Maintaining a steady power output keeps your body working at the same metabolic intensity throughout the entire climb. According to the power–heart rate relationship, a steady power output results in a more stable heart rate, reduces excessive sympathetic nervous system activation, and slows the rate of glycogen depletion.

Research shows that at the same average power, variable power (Variability Index > 1.10) consumes approximately 5–8% more energy than steady power (VI ≈ 1.02–1.05). In a 2–3 hour climbing event, this difference could mean hitting the “wall” 30–45 minutes earlier.

Climbing Strategy Advantages Disadvantages Best Suited For
Even speed Intuitive, easy to execute Large power fluctuations when gradient changes Gentle, steady gradients
Even power High metabolic efficiency, delays fatigue Requires a power meter Any long climb
Heart rate control No equipment needed, reflects actual intensity Has lag, affected by temperature When no power meter is available

How to Execute Even Power on Real Climbs

Executing an even-power strategy requires several prerequisites:

  • Know your FTP: Target power for long climbs is typically set at 75–85% of FTP (i.e., Zone 3–4).
  • Use a power meter or smart trainer: Real-time power data is the most direct feedback tool.
  • Shift down early: Switch to an easier gear before the gradient increases, avoiding sudden power spikes.
  • Accept slower speeds: Slowing down on steeper sections is correct—don’t sprint just because someone passes you.

Key Numbers: The Relationship Between Gradient and Power

For a rider weighing 70 kg (78 kg combined bike and rider), the power required to climb at 15 km/h is approximately as follows:

Gradient Required Power (approx.) Percentage of 240W FTP
5% ~185 W 77%
7% ~240 W 100%
9% ~295 W 123%
11% ~350 W 146%

As the table shows, when the gradient exceeds 9%, almost everyone must slow down to maintain power within the aerobic threshold. Forcing the same speed will only push you above FTP in a short time, rapidly accumulating fatigue.

Practical Recommendations

  1. Set a target power zone before starting—for long climbs, maintain 75–85% of FTP, and in the final 2 km of a race, you can increase to 90–95%.
  2. Check your average power every 10 minutes—if it exceeds the target, actively slow down.
  3. Learn to “save” on gentler sections—pedal lightly on 4–5% gradients to let your heart rate drop slightly, reserving energy for the steeper sections ahead.
  4. Accept your speed dropping to 8–10 km/h on gradients above 10%—this is normal, not a failure.
  5. Record the power variability index (VI) of each climb—aim to keep VI below 1.05.

Conclusion

The core logic of climbing pace is simple: manage energy, not speed. A power meter makes this tangible rather than abstract, but even without one, as long as you understand the principle of “slow down on steep sections, hold steady on gentle ones,” you can complete the same ascent with less energy. Next time you face a long climb, try letting go of your obsession with speed and let power data—or your body’s perception—guide your pacing rhythm.

相關影片
訂閱CT的頻道

訂閱 CT Yeh,看武嶺實測與路線攻略

北進武嶺、西進武嶺、經典百K,每條路線都親自騎過,配速、爬升、補給點全部實拍實測。

467 部影片 · 累計 838 萬次觀看