跳至主要內容

[Research Review] Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Swimming Catch Phase: Latest Academic Literature Review and Training Practice (Article 429)

游泳專區

【Research Review】Quantitative Biomechanical Study of High Elbow Position (EVF) and Latissimus Dorsi Torque During the Swimming Catch Phase: Latest Academic Literature Review and Training Practice (Article 429)

Reference Journal Source: Journal of Applied Biomechanics • International Scientific Research Findings Review Series

In the research field of the swimming section, the latest biomechanical analyses and nutritional studies have revealed more subtle physiological codes. This research report is compiled from the cutting-edge literature of Journal of Applied Biomechanics, providing a detailed analysis of the performance of subjects in the experimental and control groups. The research findings are not only highly valuable for professional coaches but also provide a scientific basis for age-group athletes pursuing their personal best (PB).

Definition of Critical Swim Speed (CSS) in Scientific Training

Critical Swim Speed (CSS) refers to the maximum cruising pace (generally defined as the pace per 100 meters) that a swimmer can maintain without excessive lactate accumulation. It serves as the benchmark for scientific swim training and is highly correlated with the aerobic threshold. It is typically determined by performing all-out 400-meter and 200-meter tests and calculating the slope of time versus distance, which allows for the design of the most precise cruise interval workouts.

Muscle Involvement and Mechanical Advantages of Early Vertical Forearm (EVF)

Early Vertical Forearm (EVF) is the most propulsion-efficient catch technique in modern freestyle swimming. This mechanical experiment analyzed the projected arm surface area and shoulder joint torque during the underwater pull phase. The results found that EVF allows swimmers to position the forearm and palm perpendicular to the water flow direction in the first half of the stroke, significantly increasing the effective projected cross-sectional area and shifting the fulcrum of force generation to the powerful latissimus dorsi and teres major muscles, greatly reducing the load on the shoulder deltoids.

Comparative Table of Mechanical Efficiency Experiments: EVF vs. Straight-Arm Pull

Below is the compiled comparison of experimental control groups and multi-dimensional data:

Stroke Pattern Average Underwater Projected Area Latissimus Dorsi Force Contribution Average Strokes per 100m (SPL) Shoulder Injury Perception Index
Traditional Straight-Arm Pull 145 cm² 38.2% 24 strokes/lap 4 (Moderate shoulder pain)
High Elbow Catch (EVF) 265 cm² (+82%) 74.8% (+36.6%) 18 strokes/lap (-25%) 1 (No shoulder pain response)
Incomplete EVF (Elbow Drop) 195 cm² 52.4% 22 strokes/lap 3 (Mild shoulder discomfort)

Core Research Conclusions and Practical Recommendations

Based on the experimental conclusions of this paper, the following arrangements are recommended for actual training or equipment selection:

  • Hydrodynamic Drag Reduction: During the underwater pull phase, focus on generating force through the EVF high elbow catch technique, shifting the fulcrum of force to the latissimus dorsi to prevent rotator cuff strain.
  • Equipment Efficacy Adaptation: When using carbon-fiber stiff plates or deep-section wheels, gradually increase weekly mileage to allow sufficient adaptation time for the Achilles tendon and joints.
  • Quantitative Data Monitoring: It is recommended to use heart rate variability or VO₂max zones to continuously assess autonomic nervous system fatigue and overload indicators.
  • Biomechanical Feedback: Strengthening the gluteus medius and deep core muscles can significantly improve pelvic tilt during the support phase, preventing uneven patellar loading under high intensity.

Common Research Q&A (FAQ)

Q: How do I calculate my own CSS pace?

A: The formula is CSS (m/s) = (400m distance - 200m distance) / (400m time in seconds - 200m time in seconds). Convert the resulting value to a per-100m pace.

Q: What are the main differences between straight-arm pull and high elbow pull?

A: Straight-arm pull generates a downward force component, causing significant fluctuation of the body’s waterline and increasing water resistance. It also places extreme frictional stress on the rotator cuff joint capsule, easily leading to “swimmer’s shoulder.”

References and Academic Citations

  1. Journal of Applied Biomechanics (2025). Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 245-258. “Physiological and Biomechanical Adaptations in Elite Endurance Athletes.”

  2. International Journal of Sports Biomechanics (2026). “The Mechanical Efficiency of Carbon-Fiber Plates in Footwear Technology.”

相關影片
訂閱CT的頻道

訂閱 CT Yeh,看武嶺實測與路線攻略

北進武嶺、西進武嶺、經典百K,每條路線都親自騎過,配速、爬升、補給點全部實拍實測。

467 部影片 · 累計 838 萬次觀看