跳至主要內容

[Research Review] Aerodynamic and Rolling Resistance Report of Carbon Fiber Wheelsets with Different Rim Depths under Various Crosswind Yaw Angles: Advances in Frontiers in Sports Physiology Research (Article 302)

單車專區

[Research Review] Aerodynamic and Rolling Resistance Report on Carbon Fiber Wheelsets of Different Rim Depths at Various Yaw Angles: Advances in Frontiers in Sports Physiology (Article 302)

Source Reference: Journal of Sports Sciences • International Scientific Research Findings Review Series

In the research field of the Cycling Section, the latest biomechanical analyses and nutritional studies have revealed more subtle physiological codes. This research report is compiled from frontier literature in the Journal of Sports Sciences, providing a detailed analysis of the performance of experimental and control group subjects. The findings are not only highly valuable for professional coaches but also provide a scientific basis for citizen-level riders pursuing their personal best (PB).

Aerodynamic Analysis of Rim Depth and Yaw Angle

More than 80% of aerodynamic drag on a road bike comes from the rider, but during high-speed cruising, rim depth has a decisive physical effect on drag. This study tested carbon fiber wheelsets with rim depths of 35mm, 45mm, and 60mm in a wind tunnel, measuring drag variations at yaw angles from 0° to 15°. The results showed that modern wide-rim designs (“fat rims”) can generate a significant “Sailing Effect” at yaw angles of 7°-12°, which actually provides a forward thrust that reduces drag.

Cycling pedaling is a highly repetitive concentric movement; if saddle height is set improperly, it can significantly increase compressive forces on the knee joint. This mechanical experiment showed that when the saddle is too low (thigh-calf angle at the dead spot less than 140°), the shear stress generated at the patellofemoral joint (Patellofemoral Shear Stress) increases exponentially. This is also the fundamental mechanical cause of patellofemoral pain syndrome and patellar tendinitis.

Comparative Table of Drag Data from Wind Tunnel Testing of Different Rim Depths

Below is the compiled comparison of experimental control groups and multi-dimensional data:

Rim Depth Drag at 0° Yaw (W) Drag at 7.5° Yaw (W) Drag at 15° Yaw (W) Perceived Crosswind Handling
Low Profile (24mm Climbing Rim) 12.8W 12.4W 11.2W 1 (No effect at all)
Mid Profile (40mm All-Rounder Rim) 9.5W 8.1W 7.9W 2 (Slight wobble)
High Profile (60mm Aero Rim) 7.2W 4.8W (Sailing Effect) 6.8W 4 (Requires focused handling)
Disc Wheel (TT/Triathlon Rear Wheel) 5.1W 2.1W (Maximum Propulsion) 9.5W (Severely Affected by Wind) 5 (Difficult to handle in crosswinds)

Core Research Conclusions and Practical Recommendations

Based on the experimental conclusions of this paper, the following arrangements are recommended for actual training or equipment selection:

  • Quantified Data Monitoring: It is recommended to use heart rate variability or VO₂max zones to continuously assess autonomic nervous system fatigue and overload indicators.
  • Biomechanical Feedback: Strengthening the gluteus medius and deep core muscles can significantly improve pelvic tilt during the stance phase, preventing uneven patellar loading under high intensity.
  • Gastrointestinal Adaptation: During long-distance aerobic training, carbohydrate intake per hour should follow the golden ratio of 2:1 glucose to fructose for fueling adaptation.
  • Equipment Adaptation: When using stiff carbon soles or deep-section rims, gradually increase weekly mileage to allow sufficient adaptation time for the Achilles tendon and joints.

Common Research Q&A (FAQ)

Q: What is the Sailing Effect in aerodynamics?

A: It refers to the phenomenon where, when crosswind blows from a specific yaw angle, the wide cross-section of the rim guides airflow to create a pressure difference on its sides, thereby generating a forward propulsive force component.

Q: Does the 0.95 coefficient for a 20-minute all-out effort apply to everyone when measuring FTP?

A: For riders with extremely high anaerobic capacity (such as sprinters), the 0.95 estimate tends to be too high; their actual FTP may only be 88-92% of the test value.

References and Academic Citations

  1. Journal of Sports Sciences (2025). Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 245-258. “Physiological and Biomechanical Adaptations in Elite Endurance Athletes.”

  2. International Journal of Sports Biomechanics (2026). “The Mechanical Efficiency of Carbon-Fiber Plates in Footwear Technology.”

相關影片
訂閱CT的頻道

訂閱 CT Yeh,看武嶺實測與路線攻略

北進武嶺、西進武嶺、經典百K,每條路線都親自騎過,配速、爬升、補給點全部實拍實測。

467 部影片 · 累計 838 萬次觀看

延伸閱讀